- Category: Uncategorised
- Published: Thursday, 30 October 2014 17:10
- Written by Larry Lewis
- Hits: 7987
News Media Articles:
- Publication article: Should I be worried about GMOs in my pet food?
- Truth about technology website - A discussion about the safety of GMO's.
- The Washington Post: The GMO Debate - 5 Things to Stop Arguing
- CAST Issue Paper: GMO Potential Impacts
- Mark Lynas Lecture to Oxford Farming Conference, 3 January 2013
- American Medical Association (AMA)
Bioengineered foods have been consumed for close to 20 years, and during that time, no overt consequences on human health have been reported and/or substantiated in peer-reviewed literature. However, an extremely small potential for adverse events exists, due mainly to horizontal gene transfer, allergenicity, and toxicity.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration:
The agency is not aware of any information showing that foods derived by these new methods differ from other foods in any meaningful or uniform way, or that, as a class, foods developed by the new techniques present any different or greater safety concern than foods developed by traditional plant breeding.
- World Health Organization
GM foods currently available on the international market have passed risk assessments and are not likely to present risks for human health. In addition, no effects on human health have been shown as a result of the consumption of such foods by the general population in the countries where they have been approved. Continuous use of risk assessments based on the Codex principles and, where appropriate, including post market monitoring, should form the basis for evaluating the safety of GM foods.
- National Academy of Sciences
The process of genetic engineering has not been shown to be inherently dangerous, but rather,
evidence to date shows that any technique, including genetic engineering, carries the potential
to result in unintended changes in the composition of the food.