Utah Department of Agriculture and Food



Following the devastating 2012 fire season, Governor Gary Herbert charged Agriculture Commissioner Blackham with the task of developing a cooperative strategy to reduce the size, intensity and frequency of catastrophic fires in Utah. A Central Steering Committee comprised of the leaders of Utah's federal, state and local land management agencies devised a strategy to answer the Governor's charge.

The committee continues to meet.  Its phase I final report is offered here. 

Click here for the PDF file of the final report

Click here for the appendicies which include:
     1. Working group participants
     2. Complete regional projects
     3. Fires in Utah; the current situation and existing resources

Supporting Documents for SW Region #6: 
Biomass CRS 2011;
Data on biomass markets
Federal Preparedness Proposal;
Hazardous Fuels Reduction Implementation Staffing;
NEPA Barriers; 
Planning Barriers; 
Smoke Mgt Barriers;

Beaver Catastrophic WildFire Project
Garfield Catastrophic Wildfire Project
Iron Catastrophic Wildfire Project
Kane Catastrophic Widlfire Project
Kane Catastrophic Wildfire Spreadsheet
State Suppression Proposal
Washington Catastrophic Wildfire Project


This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Program Manager
(435) 279-3603

Livestock grazing in Utah began with the arrival of the pioneers in 1847. Livestock production has since increased over the years to parallel territory and population growth.

By 1890, the range throughout the west was beyond capacity. Heavy grazing on these lands in the early part of the twentieth-century left the rangelands depleted and watersheds damaged. Additional repercussions of over used lands included soil erosion and an increase in natural disasters, such as floods that occurred largely because of bare ground created by poorly managed livestock herds.

It was during this time that the federal government established forest reserves in the form of the National Forest Service in an effort to curtail overgrazing and harmful watershed side-effects. This period marked the beginning of the scientific-range-management style that we see on our lands today (Banner et al., 2009).

Sheep Were Dominant

Sheep production was the dominant livestock sector in Utah at the start of the 1900s, reaching a peak of nearly three million sheep and lambs by 1930 (Banner et al, 2009).

In 1929, at the onset of the Great Depression, wool was selling at the highest price ever. This trend, however, like everything else in the economy, was badly hurt by the economic downturn and was sent tumbling downward in 1929 (Murphy, 1996).

Since that time, the sheep industry has declined by more than 89 percent (Banner et al., 2009). In addition to declining wool prices, Congress passed the Taylor Grazing Act in 1934 to restore damaged watersheds and limit grazing. These new measures had significant effects on the number of sheep in Utah, reducing them by almost one million following the passage of this act. (USU Extension, 2011).

Cattle Now Rule

This period of decline in the sheep industry was followed by growth in the beef industry, as producers switched from sheep to cattle. The number of beef cows in Utah has nearly doubled since 1920 (Banner et al., 2009) to become what is now the dominant sector in Utah agriculture (Godfrey, 2008).

Grazing is Changing

In Utah, there are nearly 45 million acres of grazing land; 73 percent federally owned, 9 percent state owned, and 18 percent privately owned (GOPB, 2011).

The largest portion of this grazing, done on federal lands, is currently decreasing. Federal grazing permits are allotted in Animal Unit Months, or (AUMs). An AUM is the amount of forage required to feed an animal unit the equivalent of a mature, 1,000 pound cow for one month. On BLM lands, AUM's have declined from 2,749,000 in 1940 to less than 675,000 AUMs in 2009, a four-fold reduction (Banner et al., 2009).

Forest Service lands have experienced a similar decline, decreasing from 2.7 million AUMs in the 1940s, to 614,000 in 2008.

While the percentage of forage harvested by livestock on federal lands is decreasing, the total number of AUMs in the state has remained relatively stable over the past 60 years (Godfrey, 2008). This seems to suggest that an increasing percentage of feed may be coming from privately-owned feed sources.

Utah BLM currently manages approximately 22 million acres of land in the State. Many of Utah's BLM grazing allotments are 'common' allotments where more than one permittee is authorized to use the allotment. Grazing on these allotments is authorized through the issuance of grazing permits that provided for just over 675,000 AUMs in 2008.

Utah citizens, including ranchers, have a great appreciation for vibrant, healthy rangelands and wildlife. However, the age old questions of who should bear the costs, and who receives the benefits from publicly owned wildlife, often puts a disproportionate burden on the agricultural community. This issue is not isolated to Utah, and is amplified in the western states where there is a high percentage of public land. Among the western states, Utah has been the most proactive in efforts to resolve this dilemma.

Frequently, when resources are held in the public trust, there is an inherent lack of accountability and incentives to manage those resources at the highest level. The 'Perverse Triangle of Incentives' (figure 3) graphically demonstrates the issue. Wildlife belong to the public, who has limited opportunity to manage for those values. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (DWR) has the responsibility to manage the wildlife, but DWR doesn't own the wildlife or the habitat on which they are so dependent. Landowners own the habitat (in the case of private land) and as permittees, are the key players in grazing management on public land. However, landowners have little opportunity or incentive to manage for wildlife values.

The Utah Legislature recognized this issue and created the Cooperative Wildlife Management Unit (CWMU) program to provide incentives for large private land owners to manage for wildlife values. The program has resulted in vastly increased hunting opportunities and has mostly resolved wildlife/rancher conflicts on large private land holdings. However, restitution of damages to crop land is still inadequate. The program, guided by DWR, puts management in the hands of those most capable to achieve results and allows these large landowners to recover the cost of production for wildlife. Finding similar programs to provide solutions for smaller operations has been elusive.

The health of Utah's public and private rangeland resources will depend on our ability to provide incentives to ranchers, who have the greatest capability/opportunity to manage the land sustainably. If Utah is to improve the health of its public and private rangelands/watersheds, the State will need to provide guidance and incentives to achieve a high level of grazing management on a large scale. The scientifically based principles to accomplish improved management are well known, but the technical guidance, social recognition, political will, and financial resources to bridge this gap are in short supply. Land owners and permittees are the 'boots on the ground' needed to achieve ecologic sustainability and create wealth from the land to be sustainable.

Well managed livestock grazing, though poorly understood by the average citizen, is the most effective way to manage vegetation on a large scale to benefit watershed health and preserve wildlife habitat. Improving grazing management on Utah's public and private rangelands should be viewed as 'high leverage' and a long-term priority. A 1998 Government Accounting Office report titled, Forest Service Barriers to Generating Revenue or Reducing Costs, portrays the importance of 'economic sustainability' on US Forest Service Lands and demonstrates the critical importance of multiple uses for the lands. The report provides good examples for a more 'capitalistic' approach to public land management based on private land models.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Program Manager
(435) 279-3603

There are 45 million acres of grazing land in Utah of which 73% is federal land, 18% is private, and 9% is state owned (Fig. 4). There is cause for optimism since science demonstrates that good grazing management can improve resource/watershed health, forage productivity, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunity while reducing the risk of catastrophic wild fire.

The GIP range professionals and grazing boards have been successful in improving understanding and communication between federal land management agencies, livestock operators, and non-government organizations concerned about the health of Utah's rangeland resources. The funds available through GIP are a critical bridge for providing resources to improve grazing management practices based on scientific principles. (Fig. 5 large pdf file).

Grazing management principles:

Time...(duration of animals on a pasture)
Timing...(season of the year that the pasture is grazed)
Intensity...(amount of forage removed)

See the entire presentation in this slide-show (Fig. 5).

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Program Manager
(435) 279-3603

The Program has four major components:

  1. With input from grazing boards, USU extension and the UDAF, recommend positions on grazing issues for federal and state agencies.
  2. Implement projects that rehabilitate our natural resources, increase productivity and protect the landscape.
  3. Work with state and federal agencies to make land management decisions that are "open" and are more reasonable, affordable and effective in addressing grazing management and productive capacity of rangeland and watersheds.
  4. Partnering with others to improve resource health and preserve livestock grazing on public lands.
    Sustainable Grazing for Southern Utah Forests; Aspen Restoration Guidelines; Public affairs video on livestock grazing.


UDAF Commissioner Blackham established a new division within the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food titled the Grazing Improvement Program (GIP).

The Program has established a State Grazing Advisory Board and six Regional Grazing Advisory Boards to improve the grassroots voice of both private and public grazing land managers. (Fig. 3)








Within Code 4-20-1.5, a summary of the State Grazing Board's responsibilities states it is created to receive recommendations from regional boards concerning public and private grazing lands, issues that impact grazing on said lands, and recommend state policy positions for federal and state lands to the UDAF and the Public Lands Policy Coordination Office (PLPCO).

The code also defines the use of funds for range improvement and maintenance, control of predatory animals, management and extermination of invasive and poisonous plants, purchase or lease of lands for the benefit of a grazing district, watershed protection and development, and improvement and the general welfare of livestock grazing within a district.


This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., Program Manager
(435) 279-3603

Measuring the success of the GIP program is best achieved in three main areas:

Tavaputs Ranch

The benefits of healthy livestock grazing can be felt in Utah's rural communities.

A grazing expert, Charley Orchard of Montana's Land EKG, says a successful livestock operation improves the prosperity of agriculture, the local community and our natural resources. See the video.

Livestock's contribution to local economies. See the video.

GIP has implemented hundreds of projects since 2006. Project funds have aided ranchers not only in installing infrastructure such as water systems and fences, but also in removing invasive plants and reseeding with beneficial species after fires and vegetation treatments.

See before and after photos of projects

For generations the measurement of ecological, social, and economic factors surrounding grazing and rangelands has been difficult to calculate. New technology is evolving that will allow landscape scale measurements that can clearly track and document changes in range conditions over the long-term. Until that time, it might be well to remember the quote of Albert Einstein, "Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts".